Solutions or Responses?

Public discussion of the various crises we're facing today, from climate change to energy shortages and biodiversity loss, is dominated by the feverish search for "solutions".  While this is a very natural inclination, it is evidence of an incorrect understanding of our situation:

To talk about "a solution" implies the belief that there is something we can do to prevent or fix "the problem".

If you look clearly, dispassionately and holistically at our problem set in all its grim converging glory, it becomes immediately clear that we are well past the point when human action could avert, let alone reverse, the coming changes. We face a range of wicked problems, from overpopulation through climatic, ecological and energy difficulties, dysfunctional human socioeconomic organizations, to outright anthropogenic extinctions.

Any one of these problems could be the trigger for a human collapse of one sort or another, or we might muddle along for quite a while as a sort of entropy degrades our existence bit by bit. What is clear to many of us is that the multidimensional interactions of the component problems make this a large scale macro-problem with no apparent solution.

That doesn't mean we should or will do nothing, however. Even if we don't solve the crisis we will respond to it.

Our responses will probably spring more from local circumstances and personal or cultural preferences than on some overarching global framework. Group responses will run the gamut from resource wars to technological development to community restructuring, ecological education and local actions of all sorts. Individual responses will range from "canned food and ammo" to a variety of spiritual formulations (which will include "God will save us" fatalism from fundamentalists of all faiths as well as more positive teachings about attachment and change coming from the Buddhist tradition, and all points in between.

What this means is that humanity will muddle through. We will do this more successfully in some regions than others, though. Sometimes we will do even more harm on the way down as we burn down the forests and eat the songbirds from the trees. On the other hand, sometimes we will create new structures that will support rich, meaningful, non-damaging lives for those lucky enough to be part of them.

Change is inevitable, unavoidable and utterly unpredictable. IMO a person's best bet is to grow very sensitive to the changes happening around them, and to culture a flexible mind and spirit that will let them respond as effectively as possible when the local trends become apparent.

To keep hoping for "solutions" is to remain attached to the past and present, to try and close yourself off from (or even reject) the inherently fluid nature of the world and its underlying reality. To do that invites suffering and perpetual heartache, and may keep you from experiencing the joys of life that will inevitably persist, even during periods of severe, irreversible, unsolvable change.

July 31, 2008
© Copyright 2008, Paul Chefurka
 This article may be reproduced in whole or in part for the purpose of research, education or other fair use, provided the nature and character of the work is maintained and credit is given to the author by the inclusion in the reproduction of his name and/or an electronic link to the article on the author's web site.  The right of commercial reproduction is reserved.